Paintings by AI models in the manner of Caspar David Friedrich. Each one is a program: the model writes the brushstrokes, and a simulation of oil paint on linen carries them out, with bristles, wet paint that sets and dries, and glazes seen through each other.
The painters never see a picture of his work, only what is written about his materials, methods and habits. They are grouped here by round; each round tried something different. Most can be watched being painted.
Round 1 (September 22)
Three painters who had never seen a painting made with the simulator each composed an original picture: a winter, a coast and a mountain view. All three found Friedrich-like pictures: a cross among firs, a shore at dusk with a brig, a winter cross with a dead oak and a church in fog. The winter was judged best. Their skies were too straight and too alike, and the paint dried darker than they meant. A power loss ended the sessions before the painters could finish.
Round 2 (September 23, night)
New painters took the same three themes, with a short brief and an improved simulator. They had no access to round 1. All three finished in under an hour. The skies became smooth, different from each other and free of ruled strokes, and the mist and distance got better. The winter picture, Winter Evening with a Ruined Choir, became the project's benchmark. Later human and AI judges kept ranking it first.
Round 3 (September 23)
Painting at an easel, live: the painters laid down paint a passage at a time, stepped back to look and undid what failed. One painter chose its own subject, one was asked for a daylight summer scene and one for a close-up subject. The free painter chose the same twilight, crescent moon and figure seen from behind as round 2. The steered painters chose other subjects. The painters said the looking and undoing "felt like painting" and that drawing shapes felt like programming.
Round 4 (September 23)
The easel again, with the same three assignments, now with drawing tools: a pencil underdrawing, hand-drawn outlines and masks for what is in front and what is behind. These tools answered round 3's complaint that the painters couldn't draw.
Round 7 (September 24)
Three ways of working on a free subject were compared: the easel with no ready-made shapes, one hand-written program and the easel with every tool. A fourth painter wrote a plain Python program with no paint simulation at all, as a control. Left free, the three painters nearly converged on one picture: calm water, an evening sky and trees reflected in it. None of them moved Alice the way round 2's winter had.
Round 8 (September 24–25, overnight)
The painters got a commission, as a patron would give one: "a winter landscape." They used round 2's style of brief and the same three ways of working. Every picture had figures, a route through the snow and motifs the painters drew themselves. One blind AI critic ranked the wayside-cross picture first, above round 2's winter.
Round 9 (September 25, overnight)
A repeat of round 8 with two lines added to the brief: paint skies in broad strokes blended while wet, not a speckled veil, and let the surrounding paint bury the feet of things. The critics said the painted-on cracks of age were now the weakest part.
Round 10 (September 25)
A replay of round 2 exactly: its brief word for word, one program per painting and the strongest model thinking hard. There were two winters and one green summer. Alice: "This feels like progress." The person whose online post started the project said of the summer lime tree: "The trees are amazing."
Round 11 (September 25)
Other AI models painted the same winter brief: OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra, Google's Gemini 3.8 Flash and Anthropic's Claude Fable 5.1. Gemini's painting is unfinished because it ran out of credits. Each model then judged all six winters blind, its own included. Each ranked its own picture fifth or sixth, and all three ranked round 2's winter first.
Round 12 (September 25)
A study of one bare tree in winter, grown with the simulator's model of how trees branch. Alice found the results "very fractal-ey, which is the opposite of what we are going for."
Round 13 (September 25)
The same tree study with the growth model taken away. Each painter placed its trunk and limbs by hand and wrote its own rules for the fine branches. Alice: "Ouch. Wow. Ouch. U is the least bad."
Round 14 (September 25–26)
A chain of painters. Each painted a landscape of its own choosing and wrote craft notes for the next. The first attempt read a notebook of earlier painters' experience as a set of instructions, and painted a ploughed field that Alice found "very funny ... adorable" but "not a Friedrich". The chain was restarted and gave a mountain morning, an evening town on a coastal plain and a Baltic shore at dusk.
Round 15 (September 26)
The chain again, from a stripped-down studio holding only the tools and notes a painter needs. The pictures: misty mountains, an oak in snow with a church, and a Baltic shore. All three are set at dusk or dawn, with a crescent moon and a figure seen from behind. The third painter repainted round 14's shore almost exactly, without having seen it.